Beyond Planning Series - Article 3: The Living System
- Feb 4
- 24 min read
Updated: 2 days ago
Building Jazz Ensembles: Structuring Structures for Improvisation
(This is the third article in the Beyond Planning Series: Living Systems. The articles explore the intersection of strategy, design, and jazz. You may want to start here with the first article "Beyond Planning Series - Article 1: The Great Unraveling.")
"All architecture is what you do to it when you look upon it;Did you think it was in the white or gray stone? or the lines of thearches and cornices?
All music is what awakes from you when you are reminded by theinstruments,It is not the violins and the cornets, it is not the oboe nor thebeating drums, nor the score of the baritone singer singinghis sweet romanza, nor that of the men's chorus, nor that of thewomen's chorus,It is nearer and farther than they."
— Walt Whitman, "Song of Myself" (1855)
PRELUDE: LEGOS & LIVING SYSTEMS
There were always LEGO bricks in our house. From my earliest memories. Red ones. Blue ones. Yellow ones scattered with the grey plates across the living room floor. My brothers would sit with me for hours. Just building alongside and watching what emerged over days and weeks.
I learned something then that I did not have words for until decades later. The bricks themselves are not the point. The connection points are. Those eight tiny studs on top. The hollow tubes underneath. The precise tolerances that let any brick connect to any other brick. That grammar of assembly you absorb through your hands before your mind can put a name on it.
Now I watch my five-year-old son dump the same bricks on the same floor. He does not read instructions either. He builds. He breaks. He rebuilds. The structure teaches him as he shapes it. This is also how living systems work. This is how organizations work.
Not in the piece or functions or silos. In the spaces between them. In what awakens when structure meets practice aligned to purpose.
Unfortunately, organizations rarely work this way. They are often less than the sum of the constituent parts. Most optimize for control and predictability rather than adaptation. They slow feedback loops to the speed of approval processes. They centralize decisions, creating bottlenecks in ways that disconnect sensing from skillful response. They introduce practices without creating the structures and policies to enable new ways of working.
But some organizations learn to breathe. To improvise while maintaining the beat. To coordinate through sensing and responding rather than planning and executing.
How do you build an organization where this kind of improvisation is possible?
Not through absence of structure. Chaos is not freedom. Not through rigid structures. Control is not coordination. Through something else entirely.
Living systems maintain identity through continuous transformation. They coordinate without central control. They adapt locally while serving the whole. They sense their environment and respond faster than planning cycles allow.
This happens through what sociologist Pierre Bourdieu called structuring structures. Frameworks shaped by past experience that simultaneously shape future practice. Social order emerges without central planning. People coordinate without hierarchical control.
Through what Bourdieu termed habitus. Dispositions so deeply embodied they enable action faster than thought. Years of practice create patterns of perception and response that feel natural. Inevitable. Obvious. You do not think about how to act. You just act. The structure has become part of you.
Jazz musicians live in this reality. Duke Ellington's orchestra coordinated fifteen musicians without a conductor dictating every move. John Coltrane's quartet sustained fourteen-minute conversations with minimal harmonic structure. Weather Report layered five voices into complexity that sounds impossible yet feels inevitable. Art Blakey's Jazz Messengers rotated young musicians through the band, each generation learning from the previous, each performance simultaneously rehearsal and concert.
Collectively orchestrated without being the product of the orchestrating action of a conductor.
That is Bourdieu's phrase. It might as well describe every great jazz ensemble.
This is what Article 3 explores. Not jazz as metaphor. Jazz as model. A proven approach to building living systems that sense, respond, adapt, and evolve while maintaining coherent identity. Organizations that work like organisms rather than machines. Structures that enable rather than constrain.
It's not whether your organization needs to learn to improvise. In a world where environmental change exceeds planning capacity, improvisation and adaptation is survival. The real question is whether your current structures and policies enable you to swing.
From classical to jazz. From control to coordination. From conducting to cultivating. This is the journey and this is where it begins.
I. WHEN THE ORCHESTRA FAILS: STRUCTURES FOR LIVING SYSTEMS
By 2003, LEGO faced catastrophe. Sales dropped 30% year over year. The company carried $800 million in debt. Operating margins collapsed from 18% to 2.4%. Negative cash flow reached $160 million.
The diagnosis seemed obvious. Digital entertainment was killing traditional toys. Video games offered immersive experiences that plastic bricks could not match.The future belonged to screens, not blocks.
But Jørgen Vig Knudstorp saw something else. The problem was not the product. The problem was the structure.
LEGO had become what Gareth Morgan calls a machine bureaucracy. An organization optimized for control and efficiency at the expense of adaptation.[^5] Every aspect reflected this orientation. Sequential processes. Functional silos. Centralized decision-making. Information flowing up hierarchies, then back down as directives. By the time patterns became visible at headquarters, markets had shifted.
The organization could not sense fast enough to respond. Could not experiment locally while maintaining brand coherence. Could not adapt parts without breaking the whole. The structure itself prevented the very capabilities LEGO needed to survive.
This is the central challenge of organizational design for complex environments. How do you create structures fit for purpose in contexts where the purpose keeps changing?
Not structures that resist change. Structures that enable adaptation. Not architectures that eliminate uncertainty. Architectures that help organizations navigate it. Not systems that suppress local variation. Systems that amplify positive patterns while deprecating negative ones.
Living systems achieve this through what organizational theorists call loose coupling.[^6] Parts connect tightly enough to coordinate but loosely enough to adapt locally. Information flows fast enough to sense patterns but decisions happen close enough to action to respond. Vertical alignment provides strategic coherence. Horizontal coordination enables tactical flexibility.
Jazz ensembles demonstrate this daily. The rhythm section provides foundation. Bass and drums creating the pocket that enables everyone to swing together. But soloists adapt their lines in real-time based on what they hear. The structure holds firm. The improvisation flows freely. Both at once.
When Charlie Parker played Cherokee at 300 beats per minute, the rhythm section maintained tempo while Parker navigated chord changes at breakneck speed. Tight coupling in the foundation. Loose coupling in the melody. This enabled both reliability and innovation simultaneously.
LEGO needed the same capacity. Products had to maintain brand identity while design teams experimented with new directions. Manufacturing had to deliver consistent quality while adapting to changing demand. The organization required structures that could hold multiple tensions simultaneously.
Knudstorp asked the question that changes everything. What if the problem is LEGO itself?
Not "how do we fix our strategy?" but instead "How do we question the structures that produce our current strategies?"This is double-loop learning. Questioning not just what you do but why you do it. Not just tactics but the frames that generate tactics.
The answer required rethinking organizational structure from first principles. Not as hierarchy. As living system.
This requires specific structural capabilities.
Local sensing and response. Teams closest to customers, technologies, and markets must detect weak signals and act without waiting for approval. This means distributing decision rights. Creating feedback loops that operate at the speed of work rather than the speed of hierarchy. Building trust that enables information to flow horizontally as fast as it flows vertically.
Dynamic adjustment. As conditions change, the organization must reconfigure quickly. Not through comprehensive reorganizations that take months. Through continuous small adjustments that happen daily. Teams forming and reforming based on challenges. Resources flowing to opportunities. Structures evolving with minimal friction.
Emergent coordination. Rather than coordinating through central control, the organization coordinates through shared principles internalized deeply enough to guide local action. Like jazz musicians who internalize the changes so completely they can improvise coherently without a conductor. Alignment comes from collective habitus rather than hierarchical directive.
Positive pattern amplification. When experiments succeed, the organization needs mechanisms to recognize success quickly and spread learning rapidly. Not through formal knowledge management systems that nobody uses. Through communities of practice where people doing similar work learn from each other continuously. Through platforms that make good patterns visible and accessible.
Negative pattern deprecation. When things do not work, the organization needs to recognize failure fast and adjust course quickly. Not through blame and punishment that drive problems underground. Through psychological safety that makes it safe to surface issues early. Through rapid experimentation that treats failure as learning rather than shame.
This is architecture for emergence. Structure that enables improvisation rather than preventing it. Frameworks that guide without prescribing. Principles that align without controlling.
Duke Ellington built this in his orchestra. Not through conducting from a podium but by playing piano in the rhythm section. Leading from within the music. His arrangements provided structure. The harmonic frameworks and melodic themes. His musicians provided interpretation. The phrasing, dynamics, and soul. The music emerged from interaction between structure and freedom.
By 2004, LEGO needed to become this kind of organization. Not a machine executing predetermined plans. A living system sensing and responding to its environment. Not an orchestra waiting for the conductor's cue. A jazz ensemble creating coherence through distributed coordination.
The question was not why or even how to change. The question was whether the organization could survive the transformation. Whether leaders could give up the illusion of control long enough to build something better. Whether structures could shift from preventing improvisation to enabling it.
This is the shift from orchestra to jazz. From conducting to cultivating. From architecture that dictates to architecture that breathes.
The transformation would require rethinking everything. How information flows. How decisions get made. How teams coordinate. How knowledge transfers. How leadership operates. How the organization learns.
But it started with one recognition. The structure itself was the constraint that needed relaxing. Not the strategy. Not the market. Not the technology. The very architecture designed to create efficiency had become the bottleneck preventing adaptation.
LEGO needed structuring structures. Frameworks fit for purpose in environments where purpose evolves continuously. Architecture fit for use by humans who need to sense and respond rather than plan and execute.
They needed to start building a living system, starting with the rhythm section. The foundation that enables everything else to swing..
II. THE RHYTHM SECTION: DISTRIBUTED COORDINATION
Duke Ellington never conducted his orchestra from a podium. He played piano in the rhythm section. Leading from within the music, not outside it. His orchestra worked because each section developed what jazz musicians call pocket. The ability to keep time together without someone beating it into them.
When LEGO began its transformation, the company faced Ellington's challenge. How do you coordinate activity across a global organization without a conductor dictating every move?
Their solution was radical. Flatten the hierarchy. Expand horizontal coordination. Move from centers of excellence to communities of excellence.
By 2015, LEGO's structure featured only four vertical layers. But it distributed decision-making across 21 divisional subunits.[^9] High horizontal differentiation. Low vertical hierarchy. Like a jazz big band where brass, reeds, and rhythm sections each have their own voice while maintaining coherence with the whole.
The key insight came from Chief People Officer Loren Shuster years later, but it applied to the entire transformation. Traditional organizations work within a paradigm of deeply institutionalized annual processes. They optimize for control through slow, comprehensive cycles. Strategic planning. Performance reviews. Budget allocation. The devil's triangle of inertia.
But the world changed faster than annual cycles allowed. Shuster described the shift. With analytics there are far more rapid feedback mechanisms. We removed some of the big, overburdensome, bureaucratic processes which were adding value, but were they adding enough value relative to the investment?
This is the rhythm section principle. You do not coordinate through comprehensive oversight. You coordinate through continuous sensing and adjustment.
Simon Wardley's mapping methodology offers one way to externalize strategic structure without imposing control. A Wardley map visualizes your business and capability landscape. Components arranged by visibility to user and evolutionary stage across the product diffusion lifecyle. From bespoke through product to commodity.
The map itself is not the strategy. It is the chart on which you improvise. Like Autumn Leaves for a jazz musician. Everyone internalizes the map. Then they adapt based on what they sense locally.
LEGO created something similar through their Enterprise Platform, developed from 2007 to 2016. Not a rigid ERP system dictating workflows. A flexible foundation that provided discipline around core business processes while enabling distributed decision-making.
The platform worked as infrastructure. Clear enough to enable coordination. Open enough to enable local adaptation. Like the walking bass line in a jazz quartet. It does not tell soloists what to play. It creates the pocket within which they can improvise.
But platforms alone do not create rhythm sections. You need what General Stanley McChrystal calls shared consciousness. When his Joint Special Operations Task Force faced Al Qaeda in Iraq, traditional command-and-control failed. The enemy moved faster than approval processes.
McChrystal's solution was to create small, empowered teams connected by information flow. Each team could sense and respond locally. But all teams maintained awareness of the larger context. Not through hierarchy. Through radical transparency.
LEGO discovered this principle when they shifted from functional silos to cross-functional teams. The CIO reorganized IT to align with business units rather than technical specialties. Henrik Amsinck organized IT to align with the business. Instead of deep, functional experts in narrow areas.
The result looked like Weather Report layering five instrumental voices. Multiple conversations happening simultaneously. Each responding to the others. Creating emergent complexity without central coordination.
But here is what most organizations miss. The rhythm section does not eliminate leadership. It distributes it.
Leadership emerges based on who has something to say in the moment. In Ellington's orchestra, sometimes the trumpet section leads. Sometimes the saxophones respond. Sometimes the rhythm section drives. The leadership flows to where it needs to be.
LEGO built this capacity through what became their most important organizational shift. Not a new structure on paper. A new way of relating.
Communities of Excellence not Centers of Excellence.
The shift was subtle but profound. Centers of excellence design solutions in isolation then launch them to the organization. Communities of excellence co-create from defining the problem to conceptualization, to testing and iterating, to launching and communicating, to embedding.
This is distributed coordination at scale. Not waiting for the conductor's cue. Sensing together and responding as one.
JAZZ INTERLUDE #1: DUKE ELLINGTON ORCHESTRA – "COTTONTAIL"
The call: "Cottontail. B-flat. Fast swing. Head in, Webster blows, brass shouts, saxes answer, out head."
Fifteen musicians. No conductor. Perfect coordination.
Listen to the opening. Brass and reeds hit together like they share one brain. This is collective muscle memory. Years of playing together create dispositions so deeply embodied that coordination happens without thinking.
Ben Webster's tenor emerges at 0:16. He follows the chord changes. He reshapes them. Both at once. The brass shouts at 0:48. The saxes answer at 1:04. Nobody signaled the handoff. They sensed it.
Underneath everything, Jimmy Blanton's bass holds it together. Almost invisible. Absolutely essential. This is infrastructure that enables rather than controls.
Your organization has sections too. Can they hand off this smoothly? Do they sense what others need without waiting for approval?
The Blanton-Webster Band was excellent because Ellington created conditions where excellence could emerge. Structure clear enough to coordinate. Space open enough to improvise.
This is rhythm section thinking. The pocket where everyone locks in and the music flows.
Recorded: May 4, 1940, Hollywood
III. DEEP LISTENING: ORGANIZATIONAL SENSING
The John Coltrane Quartet recorded Impressions live at the Village Vanguard in November 1961. Fourteen minutes. Two chords. Four musicians creating conversation so deep it sounds like telepathy.
How?
Deep listening. Each player sensing what the others play and responding in real time. Not waiting for cues. Not following a predetermined script. Sensing and responding continuously.
Organizations need this same capacity. What Stafford Beer calls organizational sensing.[^17]
Beer's Viable System Model describes five subsystems every viable organization requires. Systems for operations, coordination, control, intelligence, and policy. But the key insight is how these systems relate.
A viable organization senses its environment faster than the environment changes. It processes that information faster than events unfold. It adapts before crisis forces adaptation.
This is what organizational designers call requisite variety. W. Ross Ashby's principle that the system with the most variety controls. Your organization must match the complexity of the environment it navigates. Not through central control. Through distributed sensing.
LEGO executives discovered this principle through their development user communities. By 2008, the company faced a creative dilemma. Internal design teams produced brilliant work. But they represented a tiny fraction of LEGO's potential creative capacity.
The solution became LEGO Ideas. A platform where users submit designs, other users vote, and successful designs become products. By 2023, the community exceeded 2.8 million users who had submitted over 135,000 ideas. The platform launches approximately 10 new products annually based on user submissions.[^19]
But LEGO Ideas is not crowdsourcing. It is organizational listening at scale.
The platform creates what Beer calls an intelligence system. Not intelligence as in smart. Intelligence as in sensing what is emerging in the environment. LEGO Ideas detects weak signals. Trends that have not yet appeared in market research. Innovations that internal designers might never imagine.
The brilliance is how it works. Users propose ideas. Other users support them. Ideas that reach 10,000 supporters move to review. LEGO's design team then evaluates feasibility, brand fit, and market potential.
This is call and response. The community calls. LEGO responds. But LEGO's response influences what the community calls next. Structuring structures. Each cycle shaping the next.
The Mindstorms story reveals this dynamic most clearly. In 2000, LEGO launched Mindstorms robotics kits. Within weeks, tech-savvy users hacked the system to extend functionality. LEGO faced a choice.
Sue the hackers for intellectual property violation. Or invite them to help develop the next version.
They chose collaboration. The next iteration, Mindstorms EV3, was co-designed with lead users and tested with hundreds of collaborators.The product succeeded because LEGO listened to what users were telling them through their hacks.
This is what McCoy Tyner does behind Coltrane's tenor solos in Impressions. He listens. Then his piano voicings respond to what he hears. But those voicings also shape where Coltrane goes next. Neither leads. Neither follows. Both sense and respond simultaneously.
When I work with executives using LEGO Serious Play methodology, organizational sensing problems become visceral. Teams build their current sensing capability with bricks. They typically create elaborate information systems. Dashboards. Analytics. Reporting structures.
Then I ask. How fast does information flow from sensing to response?
They rebuild. Suddenly the elaborate systems disappear. Replaced by direct connections between those who sense and those who decide. The problem is rarely technology. Usually it is trust.
Branch managers sense what customers need. But they do not trust headquarters to respond appropriately. So they stop reporting weak signals. Information that contradicts current strategy gets filtered out. Feedback loops slow to the speed of political navigation rather than market change.
LEGO addressed this through their fundamental organizational shift from centers of excellence to communities of excellence. When you co-create from problem definition through implementation, trust emerges from shared work rather than hierarchy.
This enabled what Loren Shuster describes as moving from deeply institutionalized annual processes to rapid feedback mechanisms.The organization could sense and respond continuously rather than waiting for the next planning cycle.
Deep listening requires more than technology or process. It requires cultural shift. From bigknowing to learning. From telling to asking. From controlling to sensing.
JAZZ INTERLUDE #2: JOHN COLTRANE QUARTET – "IMPRESSIONS"
The call: "Impressions. D Dorian to E-flat Dorian. Medium-up. Trane solos long, McCoy takes it, everybody talks, bring it home."
Fourteen minutes. Two chords. Four musicians finishing each other's musical thoughts without words.
This is organizational sensing. Real-time response to what is happening right now.
Listen at 1:30 when Coltrane explores. McCoy Tyner is not accompanying. He is participating. When Coltrane pushes harder, Tyner's voicings shift. When Coltrane pulls back, Tyner creates space. They are sensing and responding continuously.
Around minute seven the quartet reaches deep pocket. They stop thinking about coordination and just coordinate. This is organizational habitus. Collective embodied knowledge enabling action faster than thought.
The modal structure is deliberate. Coltrane removed harmonic complexity to create space for listening. Sometimes you need to simplify structure to enhance sensing.
By 10:00 they build toward climax together. Nobody signaled when to intensify. They felt it through years of practice.
Your organization needs this. Not better dashboards. Trust developed through time. Information flowing at the speed of work.
Recorded: November 5, 1961, Village Vanguard (Live)
IV. THE JAM SESSION: SELF-ORGANIZING COMPLEXITY
Weather Report's Birdland layers five instrumental voices into something that sounds impossibly complex yet feels inevitable. No conductor coordinates. The complexity emerges from musicians who internalized the structure so completely they can improvise within it while maintaining coherence.
This is self-organizing complexity. What Chilean biologists Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela call autopoiesis. Self-creation through interaction.
Living systems are not controlled from outside. They create themselves through continuous interaction with their environment. The system maintains identity while constantly adapting.
This is exactly what LEGO needed to become. An organization that could create itself continuously. Adapting to environmental changes while maintaining core identity.
The LEGO System in Play represents the ultimate structuring structure. Every brick made since 1958 connects with every other brick.This compatibility creates what seems like infinite possibility within clear constraints.
Children internalize the grammar through play. Then they improvise endlessly. The structure does not restrict creativity. It enables it. Like jazz standards enable improvisation by providing shared harmonic territory.
Roger Martin calls these cascading choices in his strategy framework. Like a jazz standard that constrains harmonic movement but enables melodic freedom, each structural choice creates conditions for the next. The brick system constrains product design. Product design enables building creativity. Building creativity enables imaginative play. Each level shapes what becomes possible at the next.
When LEGO reduced brick types by 30% during the turnaround, designers protested. Less variety meant less creativity. But the opposite happened. Constraints focused attention. Designers became more creative within a smaller palette. Speed increased. Quality improved.
This is the paradox of enabling constraints. The right limitations expand possibility and options space.
LEGO's transformation required simultaneous changes across multiple domains. Manufacturing. Design processes. Supply chain. Distribution. Marketing. Digital integration. Traditional change management would sequence these initiatives. First this, then that. But in complex systems, everything affects everything else. Sequencing creates bottlenecks.
LEGO's approach was different. They created clear principles that operated across all domains. Then empowered teams to adapt those principles to their specific contexts.
The Enterprise Platform provided technical infrastructure. But the real platform was cultural.
A set of shared principles about how to work together. How to make decisions. How to experiment and learn. How to coordinate without centralizing.
Wikipedia offers another example of self-organizing complexity at scale. Millions of contributors create an encyclopedia with no central editor. The system works through enabling structure. Not control from above.
Five pillars provide the pocket. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Neutral point of view. Free content. Respectful interaction. No firm rules. These principles create conditions for emergence without dictating outcomes.
Each article is autopoietic. Creating itself through contributor interaction. Authors add content. Editors refine it. Vandals attack it. Moderators restore it. The article maintains identity through constant flux.
LEGO's organization evolved toward this model. Not through imposing self-organization. By creating conditions where it becomes possible. The Enterprise Platform as infrastructure. Communities of Excellence as coordination mechanisms. Rapid feedback loops as sensing capability.
By 2015, the transformation showed in organizational behavior. Teams prototyped everything. Build it before you build it became unofficial motto. One regional operations manager transformed her break room into a futures lab where colleagues could model customer journey improvements.
This is jam session thinking. You do not coordinate by conducting. You coordinate by creating space where musicians can sense and respond together.
The critical concept is that self-organization is not absence of structure. It is presence of the right structures which structure the emergence of potentially beneficial patterns. The kind of structures that shapes without controlling. Guides without prescribing. Enables without dictating.
JAZZ INTERLUDE #3: WEATHER REPORT – "BIRDLAND"
The call: "Birdland. G minor. Medium funk groove. Theme, Jaco walks it, Wayne floats over, everybody layers, out on the hook."
Five musicians. Five conversations happening simultaneously (and not just in Jaco's head!). Somehow it sounds inevitable.This is what we mean by self-organizing emergent ordering to produce innovation.
Jaco Pastorius's bass line is not just foundation. It is also melody. Walking and singing. Joe Zawinul's keyboards provide harmonic structure without dictating what happens inside it. Wayne Shorter's saxophone improvises over, through, and around everything.
Each layer self-organizes while relating to others. Nobody is in charge. Everybody is in charge. The beautiful complexity emerges from musicians who internalized structure so completely. Notice the texture of how it sounds. Complex, woven but not chaotic or clumped. Layered but not cluttered.
"Birdland" became Weather Report's biggest commercial success and one of the defining tracks of jazz fusion. It demonstrates platform thinking. Zawinul's composition provides infrastructure. The players create the experience. The whole emerges from parts that sense and respond to each other continuously.
Watch for this in your organization: Can multiple initiatives run simultaneously without central coordination? Does complexity emerge naturally or does it feel forced? Are your platforms enablers or controllers?
This is platform thinking. Zawinul created infrastructure that enabled five voices to layer into something greater than any could create alone.
Recorded: 1977, North Hollywood
V. CONTINUOUS REHEARSAL: LEARNING ARCHITECTURE
Art Blakey's Jazz Messengers served as the premier university of jazz for over 35 years. Young musicians joined, learned through performing, developed their voices, then left to lead their own groups. Over 70 major artists passed through the band.[^29]
The genius was Blakey's recognition. Rehearsal and performance are the same thing. Each gig is simultaneously concert and classroom.
Organizations need this same integration. Chris Argyris distinguishes between single-loop and double-loop learning. Single-loop learning improves performance within existing frames. You get better at what you already do. Double-loop learning questions the frames themselves. You ask whether you should do something different entirely.
Most organizations optimize for single-loop learning. Process improvement. Best practices. Continuous refinement. This works brilliantly until the environment shifts so dramatically that excellence at the old game becomes irrelevant, just as LEGO faced in 2004. They had become excellent at the wrong things. Kodak too! Their learning loops optimized for incremental improvement within a failing model. They needed to question the model itself.
Knudstorp's transformation enabled double-loop learning by changing how the organization reflected on its practice. Not through annual strategic planning cycles. Through continuous experimentation and reflection.
They established quarterly futures building sessions where teams prototype emerging challenges. They created a model library where successful constructions are preserved and studied. They formed cross-functional building crews that tackle systemic problems together.
This is what Étienne Wenger calls Communities of Practice. Groups formed around shared interests who learn through mutual engagement. Not top-down training programs. Organic learning through doing together.
LEGO formalized this through their Global Learning Organization, built from 2009 to 2012 using Training Within Industry methods. The approach focuses on building organizational capability for continuous learning rather than periodic training events.
Patrick Graupp's book Building a Global Learning Organization documents how LEGO created learning capacity that transcended cultural and language barriers. The key was recognizing that people learn through repetitive, deliberate practice not lectures or manuals.
This is intentional designing of organizational habitus. The collective embodied knowledge that enables rapid coordination. You do not build it through training sessions. You build it through continuous practice together.
The U.S. Army's After Action Review process offers another model. After every mission, the team asks four questions. What did we expect to happen? What actually happened? Why did it happen that way? What will we do differently next time?
Simple. But it creates double-loop learning in real time. The team reflects on both actions and assumptions. Not months later during annual reviews when everything has been forgotten in the fog of war. Immediately. While memory and emotion remain fresh.
LEGO embedded this into organizational DNA through their Leadership Playground initiative, launched in 2018. CEO Niels Christiansen and Chief People Officer Loren Shuster believed leadership culture should not be defined top-down. They asked for volunteers from 1,200 teams to serve as playground builders. Anyone interested in shaping leadership culture could participate.
The playground builders came together, learned facilitation skills, and created what LEGO calls the Leadership Playground. Not a training program. A set of principles and practices developed from the bottom up combined with practices learned through challenges.
The Leadership Playground provides guidance on desired behaviors without dictating exactly what people should do in every situation or reducing cultural values to checklists. This is structuring structure at its clearest. Principles that shape practice. Practice that evolves principles. Both at once.
Karl Weick calls this learning by doing rather than planning then doing. Do-Learn, not Learn-Do. In turbulent environments, planning becomes impossible. But learning remains essential. Organizations that integrate learning with action adapt faster than those that separate them over time and space and function.
LEGO's transformation from 2004 to 2015 demonstrates this integration. Every initiative was both execution and experiment. Every quarterly review was both accountability and learning. Every product launch was both business outcome and organizational capacity building.
JAZZ INTERLUDE #4: ART BLAKEY'S JAZZ MESSENGERS – "MOANIN'"
The call: "Moanin'. F minor blues. Medium swing. Theme, Lee Morgan, Benny Golson, Bobby Timmons, trade with Blakey, home."
Lee Morgan was nineteen. Finding his voice through performing. This is the genius of the Jazz Messengers.
Listen to Blakey's drums behind Morgan's trumpet. Not just keeping time. Teaching through sound. Supporting by providing foundation. Challenging by pushing harder. Demonstrating excellence without words.
When Benny Golson solos, Blakey's relationship changes. Different conversation with different player. He adjusts in real-time. Continuous learning happening in every moment.
The trading section makes this explicit. Blakey's drums converse with soloists. Question and answer. Mentorship from within the music.
Over seventy major artists passed through in thirty-five years. Wayne Shorter. Freddie Hubbard. Wynton Marsalis. The band maintained identity through constant renewal. Not fixed structure resisting change. Living system regenerating through practice.
Blakey designed a university disguised as a band. Every gig simultaneously concert and classroom. Knowledge embodied through doing together rather than transferred through documentation.
By the out chorus everyone is tighter. The ensemble grew through performance itself.
Recorded: October 30, 1958, Hackensack, New Jersey
VI. THE LIVING ORCHESTRA: INTEGRATION AND EMERGENCE
By 2015, something had changed at LEGO. Not just in the numbers. Though revenue had grown 15% annually since Knudstorp's first year. Not just in market position. Though the company had become the world's most profitable toy maker.
Something deeper. The organization had learned to breathe.
Walk into LEGO's Billund headquarters and you feel it. Teams prototyping with bricks. Conversations flowing across hierarchies. Decisions emerging from people closest to the work. This is not the machine bureaucracy of 2004. This is an organism. Living. Adapting. Creating itself continuously.
LEGO's transformation followed no smooth strategic plan. Repeated attempts. Course corrections. Experiments that failed. Initiatives that succeeded beyond expectation. Each iteration building organizational capacity.
What emerged was not what Knudstorp planned. It was what the organization discovered through practice. This is the difference between conducting and cultivating. Between executing strategy and enabling emergence.
Three capabilities appeared as LEGO learned to improvise at scale. Not because someone designed them. Because the organization needed them to survive.
Collective Flow
Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi describes flow as complete absorption in activity.[^37] When skill matches challenge. When feedback is immediate. When action and awareness merge. Jazz musicians live in this state.
Organizations can achieve it too.
Listen to the Coltrane Quartet in Impressions around minute seven. They reach what musicians call deep pocket. Not thinking about coordination. Coordinating through something deeper than thought. This is collective flow. Four individuals becoming one organism.
LEGO built this capacity through their Enterprise Platform combined with Communities of Excellence. Not through the technology itself. Through what the technology enabled.
Teams could sense what other teams were doing. Information flowed at the speed of work rather than the speed of approval. Decisions happened where the knowledge lived. Coordination emerged from shared awareness rather than hierarchical control.
I have seen this in organizations that transform successfully. There is a moment when the coordination shifts. When people stop checking with headquarters and start checking with each other. When information flows horizontally faster than it flows vertically. When the rhythm section starts swinging.
You feel it before you measure it. Meetings get shorter. Decisions get faster. Innovation accelerates. Not because anyone is working harder. Because the friction disappears.
This is organizational habitus fully developed. The collective embodied knowledge that enables action faster than thought. Duke Ellington's orchestra achieved it. The Coltrane Quartet lived in it. LEGO built it through a decade of practice.
Regenerative Capacity
Living systems maintain themselves through continuous renewal. Cells replace themselves. Forests regenerate. Ecosystems adapt.
Organizations need the same capacity. Not just resilience. The ability to bounce back. Regeneration. The ability to create new capabilities as old ones become obsolete.
Art Blakey understood this. The Jazz Messengers rotated young musicians through the band for 35 years. Each generation learned from the previous. Each brought fresh perspective. The band maintained identity through constant renewal.
LEGO built regenerative capacity through several practices. Fresh leadership. New partnerships. Continuous experimentation. Quarterly futures sessions where teams prototype emerging challenges.
But the deepest example is the brick system itself. Every brick made since 1958 connects with every other brick. Backward compatibility means the system regenerates continuously while maintaining identity. New bricks expand possibility without breaking existing connections.
This is not preservation. This is evolution with continuity. The structure persists while everything else changes.
The question is never how do we keep what works. The question is how do we enable what might work next.
Cultivation Over Control
The shift from orchestra to jazz ensemble is ultimately a shift in leadership philosophy. Conductors control. Cultivators create conditions for growth.
Duke Ellington never stood outside the music waving a baton. He played piano in the rhythm section. Leading from within. His arrangements provided structure. His musicians provided interpretation. The music emerged from interaction between structure and freedom.
Knudstorp did something similar at LEGO. He did not fix the company. He created conditions where the company could fix itself.
Reduce complexity so people could see clearly. Create sensing mechanisms so information flowed fast. Enable distributed decision-making so people closest to work could act. Provide clear principles without prescriptive processes.
Then get out of the way.
This is what distinguishes transformation from change management. Change management is conducted from outside. Someone designs the new state. Creates the plan. Monitors execution. Controls variance.
Transformation emerges from within. Leaders create conditions. Structures enable practice. Practice develops capability. Capability enables adaptation.
I see this distinction in every consulting engagement. Some clients want me to design their future. Others want me to help them discover it. The first rarely succeeds. The second occasionally transforms.
Because here is what experience teaches. In complex, rapidly changing environments, control is impossible. The question is not whether to give up control. The question is whether to acknowledge you never had it and build capacity for something better.
Improvisation. Adaptation. Emergence.
The Architecture That Breathes
LEGO in 2004 was dying because it had become architecture without music. Structure without life. The organization optimized every process, controlled every variable, planned every initiative. Everything worked perfectly. Except it did not work at all.
By 2015, LEGO had become music made architectural. Structure that breathes. Framework that enables. Principles that guide without prescribing.
This is what Bourdieu meant by structuring structures. This is what Walt Whitman saw in architecture and music. This is what every great jazz ensemble demonstrates.
Design shapes structure. The structure shapes practice. Practice shapes structure. Both at once. Always.
We do not play the music. We become the music through playing it. And in that becoming we discover what every child knows and every adult forgets. What every jazz musician embodies and every conductor misses. What LEGO almost lost and barely recovered.
CODA: THE MUSIC THAT SAVES US
The poet William Carlos Williams watched his city orchestra tune up. Broken off. Resumed. Broken off again. Then suddenly the music emerged.
He understood what organizations need to understand. Transformation is not clean. Strategy is not linear. Coordination is not controlled.
But the music emerges anyway. If you create conditions. If you practice together. If you hold structure lightly enough that it can breathe.
He wrote what he saw:
Nevertheless
the orchestra has
tuned up
three times,
broken off twice,
resumed and
broken off again:
if it's fine, it's fine;
if not, it's fine also
who cares?
But the music, the music!
—has reëmerged and
holds now
together, holds
together the whole precinct
This is what LEGO discovered between 2004 and 2015. The music breaks off. You resume. You try again. Not in spite of failure but through it.
The transformation from $800 million debt to the world's most profitable toy company happened through one realization. Structure matters. But not structure that controls. Structure that enables.
The LEGO brick itself teaches this lesson. Standardized connection points create infinite possibility. Every brick since 1958 works with every brick today. Clear constraints enable endless improvisation.
This is structuring structure at its purest. This is architecture that awakens through use. This is music that emerges through practice.
And this is what every organization can become if leaders learn what jazz musicians have always known.
The orchestra tunes up. Breaks off. Resumes. The music emerges.
CLOSING: THE ORCHESTRA
Nevertheless
the orchestra has
tuned up
three times,
broken off twice,
resumed and
broken off again:
if it's fine, it's fine;
if not, it's fine also
who cares?
But the music, the music!
—has reëmerged and
holds now
together, holds
together the whole precinct,
reestablishing,
past effort
the battered bank
building
that stands here,
the small city
the river
running
through it,
the people,
their ears
attentive
to the music
that saves us from
destruction
— William Carlos Williams, "The Orchestra" (1954)
Comments